and that modern takes would either ultimately be throwback fanservice, or something so wildly different that it couldn’t even be considered cyberpunk anymore
I think this is where we’re at, yeah. If a novel actually fits the hard definition of “cyberpunk” then it’s most likely using that cliched setting of a retro-futuristic 1980s. And yet if it includes all the aspects of our modern dystopia then it just becomes “near future” and not cyberpunk anymore.
Does Gibson’s style differ in “The Peripheral” compared to “Neuromancer” though?
Yes, absolutely. As genre-defining as it was, Neuromancer was actually Gibson’s first novel. He has grown a lot as a writer since then and I think The Peripheral is much more approachable.
I had originally posted a more long-winded version of the OP in !cyberpunk@lemmy.zip but it was with my now-deleted piefed account
Did the post not go through? Did you delete it? I’m sorry you weren’t able to make the post there. I’m definitely open to more book-specific discussions, but the majority of that community is just me shouting into the void and I haven’t had anything to say about books recently. Feel free to post there!
If you don’t actually care about continuity then this may not matter to you, but be aware that season 2 ends with a solid ending for the series. Then The Book of Boba Fett came out and was doing so poorly they shoved the season 3 premiere of Mandalorian as one of the episodes of Boba Fett. So if you went from the s2 finale of Mandalorian to the first episode of s3 of Mandalorian you’ll be confused about how many things changed.
Also, season 3 of Mandalorian is when things get silly, like the Jack Black episode and the Pirate King episode.