I think you need to reevaluate your position. Chalking this up to “women’s rights” is disingenuous at best.
Rowling is lobbying to exclude trans women from being legally recognized as women. You’re free to pick a side there, and I’m free to call you a transphobe if you agree with her.
What cis woman is hurt by a trans woman being legally recognized as a woman?
It’s not the transphobic billionaire, that’s for damn sure.
deleted by creator
I think you need to reevaluate your position. Chalking this up to “women’s rights” is disingenuous at best.
Rowling is lobbying to exclude trans women from being legally recognized as women. You’re free to pick a side there, and I’m free to call you a transphobe if you agree with her.
What cis woman is hurt by a trans woman being legally recognized as a woman?
“Women’s rights”? So they protect trans women too, right?
When you have to use veiled hints instead of clearly stating your point, you either know you’re wrong or you’re ashamed of your belief.
They are an anti-women’s right organisation. Trans women are women.
They don’t need vested interests to campaign against them.
which womens rights organization? because this article is about JKR specifically