SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-26 days agofree thinkingsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1799arrow-down118
arrow-up1781arrow-down1imagefree thinkingsopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-26 days agomessage-square66linkfedilink
minus-squareCrashumbc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32arrow-down1·6 days ago120 is the minimum for above average. I wouldn’t consider it “high”. (Not ragging just being honest, I’m also in the 120’s)
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up23·6 days agoHigh enough that you guys Do Not Work To Potential
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·6 days ago most common thing in the world is unattained potential Didn’t somebody say something like that?
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoFinally I can feel good that my not-giving-a-shitism is common and normal
minus-squareTartas1995@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 days agoWell the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq. While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don’t know why you don’t want to consider top 9% as “high”. What is high in your opinion?
120 is the minimum for above average. I wouldn’t consider it “high”. (Not ragging just being honest, I’m also in the 120’s)
High enough that you guys Do Not Work To Potential
Didn’t somebody say something like that?
Finally I can feel good that my not-giving-a-shitism is common and normal
Well the average is normed to 100. So 120 is not the minimum for above average. The top 9% of population would be above 115iq.
While high IQ is more of a diagnosis than anything, the statistics are real. I don’t know why you don’t want to consider top 9% as “high”.
What is high in your opinion?