Half of LLM users (49%) think the models they use are smarter than they are, including 26% who think their LLMs are “a lot smarter.” Another 18% think LLMs are as smart as they are. Here are some of the other attributes they see:

  • Confident: 57% say the main LLM they use seems to act in a confident way.
  • Reasoning: 39% say the main LLM they use shows the capacity to think and reason at least some of the time.
  • Sense of humor: 32% say their main LLM seems to have a sense of humor.
  • Morals: 25% say their main model acts like it makes moral judgments about right and wrong at least sometimes. Sarcasm: 17% say their prime LLM seems to respond sarcastically.
  • Sad: 11% say the main model they use seems to express sadness, while 24% say that model also expresses hope.
  • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I had to tell a bunch of librarians that LLMs are literally language models made to mimic language patterns, and are not made to be factually correct. They understood it when I put it that way, but librarians are supposed to be “information professionals”. If they, as a slightly better trained subset of the general public, don’t know that, the general public has no hope of knowing that.

    • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Librarians went to school to learn how to keep order in a library. That does not inherently make them have more information in their heads than the average person, especially regarding things that aren’t books and book organization.

  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Nearly half” of US citizens are right, because about 75% of the US population is functionally or clinically illiterate.

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      According to the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, 2013, the median score for the US was “level 2”. 3.9% scored below level 1, and 4.2% were “non-starters”, unable to complete the questionnaire.

      For context, here is the difference between level 2 and level 3, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_the_International_Assessment_of_Adult_Competencies#Competence_groups :

      • Level 2: (226 points) can integrate two or more pieces of information based on criteria, compare and contrast or reason about information and make low-level inferences
      • Level 3: (276 points) can understand and respond appropriately to dense or lengthy texts, including continuous, non-continuous, mixed, or multiple pages.
    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the specific is that 40% of adult Americans can’t read at a seventh grade level.

      Probably because they stopped teaching etymology in schools, So now many Americans do not know how to break a word down into its subjugate parts.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        21% of adults in the US are illiterate in 2024.

        54% of adults have a literacy below a 6th-grade level (20% are below 5th-grade level).

        https://www.thenationalliteracyinstitute.com/2024-2025literacy-statistics

        Specifically it is about 75% of the population being functionally or clinically illiterate as I said. This is more likely caused by the fact that American culture is anti intellectual, and not the lack of being taught etymology, as etymology has little to do with literacy.