• Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah exactly. Normal inheritance means their kids or spouse inherit, and the number of billionaires remains the same.

      • Don Escobar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fun fact, if I were to inherit the wealth of a billionaire family member who was shot in public I’d get philanthropic real fast!

        • RQG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Many people say this. However of those who talk the talk, barely any ever walk the walk.

          However I think if you are born an heir to a billionaire, you’d lack the perspective which might foster selfless philanthropy.

          I’d like to think that if someone from the working class would randomly get such money they would. But it still seems unlikely.

          • glitchdx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            self preservation isn’t a selfless motive, but if it results in philanthropy then that’s a win.

            • PNW clouds@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Also, he has a lot of kids now… money tied up over inheritance squabbles and civil cases getting redistributed to lawyers and court systems. I imagine more kids will come out of the woodwork too claiming a piece of the inheritance pie

        • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          That is why MacKenzie Scott is the best living billionaire.

          She did just that before all this mess started.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      By this algorithm, it would have to. Otherwise it’d just create a new billionaire who’d go to the back of the line

    • zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      In some cases, the wealth might simple be gone because the stock crashes of which the bulk of the wealth is built.