• RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    Eh things will get more dire but doubt it’s happening anywhere fast enough for that

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s already having nasty effects already? Storms are worse and more intense, more flooding that kills people… how many people have to die before you say “that was quicker than I expected”?

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        How would stuff I know have happened already in a timescale I know be unexpected to me?

        Shit would have to get worse at a rate beyond what’s expected now for me to think it was quicker than expected.

        It’s like doing multiplication. 1*2 = 2. Okay makes sense. 2*2 = 4 oh damn that was quicker than expected! lol

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      What are you basing that conclusion on, other than vibes?

      Seriously, have you looked at ANY of the data? Any reports or papers written by people who study it?

      The theme is consistent among them: sooner and worse than expected.

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        The actual data. It doesn’t say at all that we won’t survive a generation.

        The theme is consistent among them: sooner and worse than expected.

        Compared to what exactly? A lot of the data just confirms the earlier data