• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The spatial dimensions are related to each other via the Euclidean metric (AKA the Pythagorean formula): d2 = x2+y2+z2.

    The time dimension is related to the spatial dimensions via the Minkowski metric, which differs only by one sign: d2 = x2+y2+z2-t2. So it’s kind of the same thing as a spatial dimension, but with a difference.

    Among other things, the change in sign means that, where spatial rotations result in circular transformations, spacetime rotations with a time component (AKA acceleration) result in hyperbolic transformations. And the asymptotes of the underlying hyperbola are the light cone of the center of the transformation—which is why no amount of acceleration can cause an object’s future path to leave its current light cone, and why faster-than-light travel is impossible.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’d be spacetime, from Einstein’s general relativity. I suppose different names for the dimensions are warranted, since we can move freely forwards and backwards in the space dimensions, but the same does not apply for time. I can’t go backwards with that, or stop. It’s all part of one thing, thoigh. Or at least solving gravity made Einstein realize space and time are connected.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Weirdly, the math at the quanta level works in both directions (time-wise).

      I guess something happens when you get a few atoms together that changes this.

      Maybe AbouBenAdam has some insight.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        Isn’t that when people always start talking about entropy and how that gives us an arrow of time?

        And I think whether math “works” within an incomplete model isn’t really proof. I mean I can calculate a negative amount of people on the bus… But that alone doesn’t make it possible/real.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Get 3 sticks, try and arrange them all perpendicular to each other. You can do it. Now try with 4, you can’t. We live in 3D space.

    Time is a line, at least as we experience it. Just one, it’s hard to even figure out what 2D time would mean, although physicists have thought about it.

    So, 3+1=4. It turns out they’re kind of interchangeable, though, in that swapping time for a kind of angle made up of some space and some time, if done in a certain way, leaves the predictions of physics the same. That’s special relativity, and it is itself connected to the way everything is a wave.