"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agoChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square443linkfedilinkarrow-up1546arrow-down132
arrow-up1514arrow-down1imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square443linkfedilink
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up35·5 days ago2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
minus-squareAA5B@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-25 days ago2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
minus-squarehansolo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoAll of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom. Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
minus-squareBurninator05@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoFive is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it. One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.
2, assuming the broad pommel is a counterweight. If it’s flimsy lightweight material then none of them.
Getting aboard the #2 train
Yeah, longest tines wins.
2 has the best tines but that huge duckbill handle is a non-starter. 5 has the best handle
All of this is exactly right. #2 is the least cringe-inducing because of the lumpy bottom.
Is this fork thing an official diagnosis metric? Or just not yet?
deleted by creator
Five is out because its outer tines are curved. There is no reason for that and that is why I hate it.
One, however, is the best. I find it eat slower (and often less) if my silverware isn’t the size of a pitchfork.