Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agoThey'll cast you back to the Windows realm with all their toxic mightdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageThey'll cast you back to the Windows realm with all their toxic mightdiscuss.tchncs.deNatanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square6linkfedilink
minus-squareFell@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·20 days agoA true mainstream Linux distro would need guidelines like this: The user is never be expected to type a command into a terminal. The user is never be expected to edit a configuration file. There is a graphical UI for every possible action the user might want to (or have to) do. This especially includes: Configuring audio devices Installing graphics drivers Updating the operating system Managing applications and storage space Connecting to networked storage Adjusting kernel parameters (This is neccessary on certain hardware, yet, barely any distro has a graphical UI for it.) The only distro that comes close to this is Linux Mint, but not even Mint covers everything I just mentioned. If we want Linux to succeed, there needs to be at least one distro that confidently ships without a terminal.
minus-square0x0@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·20 days agoNo pc OS available meets your requirements for this lol, not linux, windowns or crapple osx Sure would be nice if linux was the first available though.
A true mainstream Linux distro would need guidelines like this:
This especially includes:
The only distro that comes close to this is Linux Mint, but not even Mint covers everything I just mentioned.
If we want Linux to succeed, there needs to be at least one distro that confidently ships without a terminal.
No pc OS available meets your requirements for this lol, not linux, windowns or crapple osx
Sure would be nice if linux was the first available though.