• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • This is the reason I’ve deliberately customized GPT with the follow prompts:

    • User expects correction if words or phrases are used incorrectly.

    • Tell it straight—no sugar-coating.

    • Stay skeptical and question things.

    • Keep a forward-thinking mindset.

    • User values deep, rational argumentation.

    • Ensure reasoning is solid and well-supported.

    • User expects brutal honesty.

    • Challenge weak or harmful ideas directly, no holds barred.

    • User prefers directness.

    • Point out flaws and errors immediately, without hesitation.

    • User appreciates when assumptions are challenged.

    • If something lacks support, dig deeper and challenge it.

    I suggest copying these prompts into your own settings if you use GPT or other glorified chatbots.











  • So i looked into the lens flare thing and I’m not so convinced.

    Here’s the kicker:

    The thing jammed radar.

    Multiple pilots VISUALLY saw it.

    It was confirmed to have descended 80,000 feet in less than a second, by both radar and a shipborne Aegis system, which prompted the pilots to take to the skies and check it out.

    The videos we see aren’t the most important pieces of evidence, it’s supporting evidence.

    Lens flare cannot explain the radar and aegis verification, and subsequent jamming, the visual confirmation, or the physics breaking performance characteristics.

    The thing went from hovering stationary, to beyond the speed of sound without creating a sonic boom.

    Anything made of meat would be liquefied by the inertia.

    There was no visual propulsion, or heat signatures from it.

    So, I reiterate, what the fuck is it?