minus-squareorsetto@lemmy.dbzer0.comtolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•I'd just like to interject for a momentlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·3 days agoI understand what argument could be made against musl, which is licensed under MIT, but what’s wrong with GPLv2? I remember Torvald saying something about not wanting to change the kernel’s license to GPLv3, but I’ve never understood the differences linkfedilink
I understand what argument could be made against musl, which is licensed under MIT, but what’s wrong with GPLv2?
I remember Torvald saying something about not wanting to change the kernel’s license to GPLv3, but I’ve never understood the differences