That running away from humans is a survival mechanism is what many rescuers say. One of them even coined the term Lost Dog Syndrome.

TL;DR: The dog is in survival / ferel mode and it is suspicious of anything other than itself. Providing a safe space and slowly introducing back to humans actually change it’s behaviour into a calm and friendly one.

All four cores at 100%? We don’t see that kind of spike when we open some other application right? Is it the experience of everyone? Or am I wrong in this?

Isn’t ‘innerHTML’ considered unsafe? Can someone with subject knowledge please explain.

As I mentioned it is to reduce dependency on CI tool. You may have to shift the tool in the future and if you use a lot of commands specific to the CI tool, that is going to be a nightmare.

Ansible is agent less and only needs SSH access. You can SSH into your local system, from the same local system. Need to add few entries in your SSH config and known_hosts. Essentially everything in Ansible are shell commands. So you are not really that much locked into Ansible.

On the question,

Does that make running it locally easier?

If you mean making it easier compared to remote, on the surface level, the answer is ‘no’. But it makes CI pipeline easier to run independent of your environment. Ansible is here to reduce dependency on a specific tool.

Bonus point is you can also create a working but basic CD system with Ansible.

Woodpecker with Ansible. Woodpecker will give container environment and using Ansible will reduce dependency on the CI tool.

Woodpecker has a alpine linux based container for Ansible. It will take some time to setup, but will make the life much easier.

AFAIK it is just a form of elitism, where they argue applied science exists only because theoretical scientists “did” something. Like you are just using someone’s stuff.

Another thing is theoretical science “indicates” advancement of science, where the applied side is just growth in sideways.