Let’s say better late than never.

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Its forced assimulation just like what the US did to the natives of America. If what the US did was genocide (it is), then what PRC is doing to Xinjiang and Tibet is also genocide.

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Fair enough, but the term genocide is far too inclusive, I’ve heard people use cultural genocide instead.

    • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d swear that there is a message group specifically for .ml users to jump in whenever any criticism is leveled at China.

    • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No, “cultural genocide” is not genocide. There is a pretty clear legal definition:

      … any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

      (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; © Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s pretty hilarious how tankies suddenly start quibbling over definitions once China is mentioned.

        Where’s that definition from?

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Raphael Lemkin, who first coined the term, defined genocide as “the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group” by means such as “the disintegration of [its] political and social institutions, of [its] culturelanguage, national feelings, religion, and [its] economic existence”.[2]During the struggle to ratify the Genocide Convention, powerful countries restricted Lemkin’s definition to exclude their own actions from being classified as genocide,[3][4] ultimately limiting it to any of five “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.[5] While there are many scholarly definitions of genocide,[6]almost all international bodies of law officially adjudicate the crime of genocide pursuant to the Genocide Convention.[7]

          From that wiki page, and I appreciate the just barely academically masked sass about why it’s such a narrow definition

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      The difference is that the US did actual genocide against the natives of America